Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 10, 1993No. A93A0611PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMurry, Presiding Judge.

Danny Murphy (plaintiff) was injured on January 6, 1990, while working in Phoenix, Arizona, and recovered workers’ compensation pursuant to Arizona law. On June 24, 1991, plaintiff filed a products liability action in Georgia against Sears Roebuck & Company, Emerson Electric Company, and Western Forge Corporation (defendants), alleging his injuries were caused by a defective tool placed in the market by defendants. Defendants denied the material allegations of the complaint and moved for summary judgment, asserting the one-year limitation period prescribed in Arizona…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stephens v. Textron, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Smith, Miller & Patch v. LorentzsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  3. Moore v. Toshiba International Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Insurance v. GlomskiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  2. Maryland Casualty Insurance v. GlomskiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  3. Maryland Casualty Insurance v. GlomskiCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API