Legal Opinion

Smith, Miller & Patch v. Lorentzson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 15, 1985No. 41503PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

Lorentzson, the plaintiff, appealed orders granting summary judgment to Dr. Rowell and Smith, Miller and Patch, the co-defendants in this case. The Court of Appeals reversed both judgments, Lorentzson v. Rowell, 171 Ga. App. 821 (321 SE2d 341) (1984), and each co-defendant applied for a writ of certiorari. We denied Dr. Rowell’s application, but granted certiorari in Smith, Miller and Patch’s appeal to consider the following questions: “Whether the two year limitation period provided in OCGA § 9-3-33 applies to this product liability action? If so, does the alleged fraud of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Daniel v. American Optical Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Trust Co. Bank v. Union Circulation Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  3. Lorentzson v. RowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Passatempo v. McMenimenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  2. Hill v. FordhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  3. Lewis v. Atlanta Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  4. Gropper v. STO CORP.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Wheeler v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API