Legal Opinion

Friends of Yosemite Valley v. Norton

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 20, 2004No. 04-15682PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

We write to clarify our Opinion of October 27, 2003, Friends of Yosemite Valley v. Norton, 348 F.3d 789, 796-99 (9th Cir.2003). There we held that the entire Merced Wild and Scenic River Comprehensive Management Plan (“CMP”) is invalid due to two deficiencies: (1) a failure to adequately address user capacities; and (2) the improper drawing of the Merced River’s boundaries at El Portal. While we remanded to “the district court to enter an appropriate order requiring the [National Park Service] to remedy these deficiencies in the CMP in a timely manner,” id. at 803, we did not “otherwise…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Friends of Yosemite Valley v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Friends of Yosemite Valley v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Friends of Yosemite Valley v. ScarlettDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
  3. Merced Irrigation District v. County of MariposaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
  4. Friends Of Yosemite Valley v. Gale NortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Friends of Yosemite v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API