Legal Opinion

Schwarz v. Straus-Frank Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 8, 1964No. 14272PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

This is a suit on a note between the-maker and payee. Plaintiff, Straus-Frank: Company, sued and recovered judgment oni a verdict against Richard F. Schwarz for-an unpaid balance of $6,653, interest and’, attorney’s fees. Defendant appealed and', contends that his plea of want of consideration was not submitted to the jury, that he-was entitled to an issue and finding on his; defense that he made the note on condition-that all payments would be made out of certain specific funds, and that the issue inquiring about his own authority as department manager for Straus-Frank…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kuper v. SchmidtTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Shaw v. McShaneTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  3. Helmke v. PrasifkaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Eagle Indemnity Co. v. CherryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  5. Hobby v. King Trailer Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hartford Casualty Insurance Co. v. Walker County Agency, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
  2. Texas Export Development Corporation v. SchlederCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. French v. State Farm InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1994
  4. Haines v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1993
  5. McPherson v. Longview United Pentecostal Church, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API