Cudahy Packing Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the Southern District of Iowa
At Law. On motions for direction of verdict
1Opinion of the Court
McPHERSON, District Judge.
The evidence of both parties being in, each party has moved for a verdict. The evidence is by an agreed statement of facts, and there is no question of fact for the jury. The plaintiff is engaged in slaughtering cattle, sheep, and hogs in South Omaha, and employs many laborers. The defendant is engaged in issuing contracts of indemnity. It issued, for a stipulated premium, a policy to plaintiff to indemnify it for all damages it might be required to pay to employés arising from personal injuries received by reason of defective machinery, etc., in and about the work.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cudahy Packing Co. v. AnthesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
3Cited by13 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Omaha Electric Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- American Auto. Ins. Co. v. FulcherCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
- Aetna Life Insurance v. Bowling Green Gas Light Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
- Puget Sound Improvement Co. v. Frankfort Marine, Accident & Plate Glass InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- McDonald v. SchreinerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.