Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Schreiner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 3, 2001No. 95,657PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.

T 1 In conformity to the Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 1 the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Cireuit ("certifying court") submitted the following questions:(1) Under Oklahoma law, where a professional liability insurance policy specifies coverage in terms of a stated dollar amount plus "claim expenses" (defined in turn as including "fees, costs and expenses which result from the investigation, adjustment, defense and appeal of a claim"), is prejudgment interest that accrues while the insurer decides to defend, rather than negotiate and pay, a claim considered a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. West Virginia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Gorenstein Enterprises, Inc., Sam Gorenstein, and David Gorenstein v. Quality Care-Usa, Inc. And David A. ScheinmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. Wiley v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  5. Shebester v. Triple Crown InsurersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Haberman v. Hartford Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. BP America, Inc. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  3. Cranfill v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  4. Haworth v. JantzenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  5. Johnson v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API