Legal Opinion

Seattle Dodge Service Co. v. Royal Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1925No. 19180. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, C. J.

— This litigation arises out of the following facts:

The second-hand Ford Sedan was sold on conditional sale contract, $125 of the purchase price being paid in cash, the balance of $368/75 being payable in monthly installments. The contract, among other things, provides:

“Said vendee hereby acknowledges receipt of said property in good condition and agrees not to sell or dispose of, or offer to sell or dispose of or loan the same, or put out of or allow the same in any manner out of his possession, or in any way or manner to encumber the same or permit liens or charges of any kind to attach or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Knutzen Auto Co. v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reliable Credit Ass'n v. Progressive Direct InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. Hassett v. Pennsylvania Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Miller v. Manhattan Fire Marine Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API