Legal Opinion

Murray v. Rio Grande Motorway, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 19, 1948No. 3702PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

Appellant brought this action against appellee, Rio Grande Motorway, seeking damages for personal injuries, alleging that one of the appellee’s buses, on which he was a standing passenger, “suddenly and violently lurched to one side” and hurled him against a seat with such “force and violence” that he was1 ruptured in his left groin.

At the conclusion of all the evidence, the trial court sustained a motion for a directed verdict on the ground that the movement complained of was no more than the normal jostling or movement of the bus as it traveled along the highway. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dempsey v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  2. McQuin v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  3. McIntosh v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Waite v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Wichita Transp. Corp. v. BralyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wiggins v. Capital Transit CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API