Legal Opinion

Hines v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided August 2, 1985No. A-333PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SINGLETON, Judge.

William Wesley Hines was convicted of one count of sexual assault in the first degree, AS 11.41.410(a)(1). He appeals contending that the trial court erred in failing to grant a mistrial and in failing to impose sanctions for the destruction of police interview notes. We affirm.

The facts of this case can best be understood in connection with the issues presented by Hines.

I. FAILURE TO GRANT MISTRIAL

We first address Hines’ argument that the trial court erred in failing to grant a mistrial. This is a matter committed to the sound discretion of the trial court. Dyer v.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Lauderdale v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Anthony v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Contreras v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1989
  2. Abdulbaqui v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1986
  3. Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1993
  4. Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2002
  5. Mustafoski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API