Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Damon

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 2005No. 04-294Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Cotter

¶42 I concur with the Court’s conclusion on issues Two and Three. As to Issue One, I strongly disagree with our conclusion that PBT results should be admitted as substantive evidence of guilt in DUI proceedings.

¶43 As acknowledged by the Court, this is not a new issue for us. In 1997, we determined in Strizich that the results of a preliminary breath test (PBT) (a/k/a preliminary alcohol screening test, or PAST) are just that-preliminary. In that case, we reviewed substantial testimony offered before the 1995 Legislative Session on the technological reliability of the testing instruments used…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CliffordMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Weaver v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. SmithIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API