Cummings v. Dudley
California Supreme Court
Appeal by defendant Dudley from a judgment for the plaintiff and from an order denying a new trial in the Fourth District Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Booker, J.
1Opinion of the Court
Ross, J.:
The complaint contains two counts: The first alleges that on or about the eleventh of October, 1878, at the county of Stanislaus, the plaintiff sold and delivered to the defendants a certain horse for the sum of fifteen hundred dollars in gold coin, which sum the defendants promised to pay plaintiff therefor, but have failed to pay any part thereof except the sum of one hundred dollars, which they paid on account.
The second count alleges that on the said eleventh day of October the defendants were indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of fifteen hundred dollars on account of the said…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pinney v. GleasonCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830
- Plowman v. RiddleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
- Townsend v. WellsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1809
- Fleming v. PotterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fagan v. HookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Yoakam v. HoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Beckwith v. SheldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Beal v. United Properties Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Delafield v. San Francisco & S. M. Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.