Legal Opinion

Delafield v. San Francisco & S. M. Railway Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1895No. 15,911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from Superior Court, City and County of San Francisco; D. J. Murphy, Judge. Action by Eobert H. Delafield against the San Francisco & San Mateo Eailway Company and others. Judgment for plaintiff against said company, and it appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

VANCLIEF, C.

Plaintiff sues as assignee of Harding & Forbes, attorneys at law, to recover $1,700 for professional services alleged to have been performed by the latter for the San Francisco & San Mateo Eailway Company and the S. S. Construction Company (corporations), at their instance and request, and for which, it is alleged, the former company and defendant Joost promised to pay said sum of $1,700. At the close of the evidence, counsel for defendants moved a non-suit in favor of the S. S. Construction Company, whereupon counsel for plaintiff, by leave of court, and without objection by any…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cummings v. DudleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hazeltine v. BrockwaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  2. Lawn v. Camino Heights, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API