Legal Opinion

McDonald v. . Zimmerman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 20, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBbogden, J.

It is accepted law that facts and transactions wbicb have no vital relation to the cause of action alleged, ought not to be scrambled in a complaint. However, mere scenery and stage decoration contained in a pleading do not warrant the conclusion that such may form the basis for the introduction of incompetent evidence at the trial. It is to be assumed that the trial judge will confine the evidence to the cause of action set up. Consequently it cannot be held, as a matter of law, that the allegations in the present complaint purporting to disclose the course of dealing between the defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pemberton v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Ledford v. Marion Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Hawkins v. . MossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Ludwick v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Ludwick v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API