Legal Opinion

Ludwick v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Affirmed on authority of Poovey v. Hickory, 210 N. C., 630, 188 S. E., 78; Scott v. Bryan, ibid., 478, 187 S. E., 756; Hardy v. Dahl, 209 N. C., 746, 184 S. E., 480; McDonald v. Zimmerman, 206 N. C., 746, 175 S. E., 92. The Court will not undertake to chart the course of the trial, or to delimit the hearing, upon attenuate questions of pleading. Pemberton v. Greensboro, 205 N. C., 599, 172 S. E., 196; S. c., 203 N. C., 514, 166 S. E., 396.

Affirmed.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scott v. . BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Pemberton v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Pemberton v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Poovey v. City of HickorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Hardy v. . DahlSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Parker v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API