Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Peterson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 19, 2012No. S11Y0423, S11Y0424Published

1DissentNahmias, Justice

The Special Master recommended that a one-year suspension is the appropriate discipline in these cases. Although the majority opinion tracks the reasoning of the Special Master, it concludes that the suspension should instead be for three years. Based on the evidence in the record and consistent with our precedent, I believe that William M. Peterson should be disbarred, and so I dissent.

In addition to abandoning two clients, Peterson made false statements to both the Investigative Panel and the Office of General Counsel of the State Bar during the disciplinary process. We unanimously…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  2. In Re O'Brien-CarrimanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  3. In Re KimbroughSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  4. In Re EatonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  5. In Re HenrySupreme Court of Georgia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API