Legal Opinion

In Re Eaton

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 19, 2009No. S09Y0704PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this disciplinary matter Coleman C. Eaton, Jr., failed to file a Notice of Rejection to the Notice of Discipline, after being properly served under Bar Rule 4-203 (b) (3) (i), of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct. Therefore, Eaton is in default, has waived his rights to an evidentiary hearing, and is subject to such discipline and further proceedings as may be determined by this Court. See Bar Rule 4-208.1 (b).

The admitted facts show that in State Disciplinary Board (“SDB”) Docket No. 5591, Eaton represented a client in an automobile collision, but did not engage in negotiations or…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re CummingsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  2. In the Matter of EatonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  3. In Re PetersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  4. In Re PetersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API