Legal Opinion

Austero v. Washington National Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1982No. Civ. 23779Published

1Opinion of the Court

132 Cal.App.3d 408 (1982)

182 Cal. Rptr. 919

JULIUS S. AUSTERO et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,

v.

WASHINGTON NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.

Docket No. 23779.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

May 28, 1982.

COUNSEL

Rutan & Tucker, Garvin L. Shallenberger, Ira G. Rivin and Patricia L. Stearns for Defendant and Appellant.

Herbert Hafif and Wayne J. Austero for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

KAUFMAN, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment, after retrial, awarding compensatory and punitive damages against it for bad faith failure to pay plaintiffs'…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API