In re to Adopt T.L.A.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MINGE, Judge.
Appellants, great-aunt and great-uncle of T.L.A. and T.E.A., challenge the commissioner’s decision to withhold consent to their adoption of the children. Because Minnesota law allows a biological parent who relinquishes parental rights to direct that the commissioner not consider relatives as an adoptive placement, because the relative preference for adoptive placement is only one factor in determining a child’s best interests, and because the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that the commissioner’s decision was in the best interests of the children,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kroning v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- In re Petition to Adopt S.T.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- In Re the Adoption of C.H.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- M.T. Properties, Inc. v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re TLACourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004