Legal Opinion

Rippy v. Shepard

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 19, 2012No. SC09-1677PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLabarga, J.

James Earl Rippy seeks review of the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Rippy v. Shepard, 15 So.3d 921 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009), which held that a farm tractor is not a dangerous instrumentality as a matter of law. In so holding, *306the district court rejected Rippy’s contentions that, because a farm tractor is a motor vehicle and because it is of such size and character as to be peculiarly dangerous in its operation, a farm tractor is a dangerous instrumentality. The First District’s opinion conflicts with our precedent set forth in Meister v. Fisher, 462 So.2d 1071, 1072 (Fla.1984),…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  2. Wallace v. DeanSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
  3. D'ANGELO v. FitzmauriceSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  4. Albritton v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  5. Anderson v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. HEATH TRERICE, individually and in his derivative capacity, etc. v. HOWARD TRERICEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. Roman v. BogleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. Anthony Newton v. Caterpillar Financial Services CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  4. Newton v. Caterpillar Financial Services CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  5. BRIAN WALKER, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF SOPHIE C. WALKER, etc. v. GEICO INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY and CARLOS ENRIQUE GILL RAMIREZ a/k/a CARLOS GILLDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API