Legal Opinion

Goldforb v. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 24, 1922No. 10027PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunklin, J.

The Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railroad Company built a track from its main line up the center of Second street to Commerce street in the city of Fort Worth, and at the same time constructed spur tracks to reach within a few feet of the sidewalk in front of the property abutting on both sides of the street, thus making such abutting property available as trackage property. I. Goldforb owned a lot abutting on the street of 75 feet frontage and extending back 100 feet. He occupied and claimed that property as his homestead. He instituted this suit against the railroad company, alleging that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. G., C. & S. F. R'y Co. v. FullerTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Swift & Co. v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
  3. Blair v. City of CharlestonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Abbott v. Inhabitants of Cottage CityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  5. Metropolitan West Side Elevated Railway Co. v. StickneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Waco v. CravenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. State v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Wilmington Housing Authority v. Nos. 312-314 East Eighth StreetSuperior Court of Delaware · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API