Legal Opinion

Metropolitan West Side Elevated Railway Co. v. Stickney

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1894PublishedCited by 38 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. E. F. Dunne, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shops

This was a proceeding instituted by the Metropolitan West Side Elevated Bailway Company for condemnation of right of way across certain lots in the city of Chicago, owned by appellees in severalty, — the appellee the Grant Manufacturing Company having a leasehold interest in the property owned by appellee Stickney. A trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for damages to land taken, and for damages for the removal of buildings, and to the parts of the lots not taken, in. severalty. Thus there is awarded the owners of the leasehold interest in lot 24, and the south six feet of lot 25, in…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Rigney v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Bohm v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Springer v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Newman v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Chicago & Evanston Railroad v. BlakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1886

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Blair v. City of CharlestonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Geohegan v. Union Elevated RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Burt v. Farmers' Co-Operative Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Lewisburg & N. R. v. HindsTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Department of Public Works & Buildings v. DivitIllinois Supreme Court · 1962

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API