Legal Opinion

Hess's Estate

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1905No. Appeal, No. 115PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 115, Oct. T., 1904, by John A. Ozias, from decree of O. 0. Northampton Co., dismissing exceptions to report of George R. Booth, Esq., auditor in estate of Peter Hess, deceased. Exceptions to report of George R. Booth, Esq., auditor. The facts appear by the opinion of the Superior Court. Hrror assigned was in dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

Peter Hess died testate in August, 1870, leaving a widow and five sons, all of age. The fund, which was the subject of the account by the executors iu the court below, consisted of *500$2,000, derived from personal property, and the interest on the same as it accrued from time to time, and the sum of $2,100, the proceeds of the sale of real estate. The appellant, although he claims as an attaching creditor of Josiah K. Hess, an alleged legatee, does not print the will of Peter Hess in his paper-book. It seems to be conceded, however, that under the terms of the will the widow…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Coleman's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  2. Swayne v. LyonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  3. Walworth v. AbelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
  4. Bouslough v. BousloughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
  5. Hammett's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Overbrook Heights Building & Loan Ass'n v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Bank of America v. McCauley, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1960
  3. Erie Mantel & Tile Co. v. Carr, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Crawford County1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API