Legal Opinion

Apland v. Board of Equalization

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 2013No. 26196PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Justice.

[¶ 1.] This is the second property tax appeal to this Court concerning the Butte County Director of Equalization’s (Director) methodology for assessing the value of the rangeland property owned by Apland and other appellees (Apland). We must decide whether Director’s recalculation on remand conformed to our decision in Apland I. The trial court held that Director did not comply with the directives in Apland I. We reverse and remand.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

[¶ 2.] Apland and Director have been involved in a dispute over the method Director used to calculate the value of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cable v. UNION COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. In Re the Guardianship of S.M.N.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Butte County v. VallerySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Burke v. Butte CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Stehly v. Davison CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dutton-Lainson Co. v. Continental InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Good Lance v. Black Hills Dialysis, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Pirmantgen v. Roberts County, South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Trask v. Meade Cty. Comm'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API