Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Local 1976, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 12, 1957No. 15026PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEMMON, Circuit Judge.
While the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., hereinafter referred to as the Act, has been termed in “its inception a novel experiment”, which “has remained a controversial piece of legislation”,1 its provisions dealing with secondary boycotts — at least insofar as they are applicable to the instant case — seem to us to be tolerably clear and eminently fair.
1. Statement of the Case
The Sand Door and Plywood Company, of Los Angeles, California hereinafter Sand, on August 2(5, 1954, filed a charge against the respondents, hereinafter the Union, alleging…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Local 74, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Associated Musicians of Greater New York, Local 802, American Federation of Musicians, Afl, and Al Manuti, Its AgentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- National Labor Relations Board v. TownsendCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- National Labor Relations Board v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, District Council of Kansas City, Mo., A. F. Of L.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Local 1976Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Douds v. Local 707 & Local 1205, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Douds v. Milk Drivers & Dairy Employees Union Local 584Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957