Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Deist

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 28, 1955No. 12934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. O. MURRAY, Chief Justice.

This suit was instituted by L. C. Cun-, ningham against Louis R. Deist in the nature of a trespass to try title suit for the recovery of title and possession of Lot 14, Block 31, New City Block 3299, in the City of San Antonio, and known as 111 Rigsby Street, San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas.

The trial was to the court without the intervention of a jury and resulted in judgment for the defendant, and plaintiff, L. C. Cunningham, has prosecuted this appeal.

The trial court properly rendered judgment for appellee when appellant rested his case, because he had neither…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stroud v. SpringfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Hovel v. KaufmanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. Goode v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Jones v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  5. Smith v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. French v. MayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ArringtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API