Legal Opinion

People v. Zacharek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 1, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The police did not engage in an impermissibly suggestive procedure when they showed a second array to the victim after she had selected from the first array a photograph other than that of defendant. Unlike the facts in People v Payne (149 AD2d 542), the police did not tell the victim that the person she had previously identified was not her assailant and they did not suggest to her that the second array contained a picture of the person they suspected had robbed her. Moreover, the suppression court properly found that the victim had an independent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. People v. LeyraNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. People v. PayneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API