Legal Opinion

George v. Thomas

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 15, 1995No. 94 Civ. 1576 (LAK)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KAPLAN, District Judge.

New York’s so-called “no fault” law, broadly speaking, precludes recovery for noneconomic loss arising out of negligence in the use or operation of a motor vehicle in this State except in case of serious injury. N.Y.Insurance L. § 5104(a) (McKinney 1985). The issue in this case, which is tendered by defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, is whether plaintiffs have raised a genuine issue of material fact as to the existence of serious injury within the meaning of the statute, caused by an accident.

Plaintiffs were injured in an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Dwyer v. TraceyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. McHaffie v. AntieriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API