Galligan v. Heath
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 245, Jan. T., 1917, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Montgomery Co., June T., 191G, No. 88, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Andrew B. Galligan v. J. Clyde Heath, Mortgagor, and E. Newton Wigfall, Real Owner. Scire facias sur mortgage.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 245, Jan. T., 1917, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. Montgomery Co., June T., 191G, No. 88, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Andrew B. Galligan v. J. Clyde Heath, Mortgagor, and E. Newton Wigfall, Real Owner. Scire facias sur mortgage. The facts appear from the following opinion by Swartz, P. J.: We examined the reasons for a new trial with great care, and we are not convinced of any error in our ruling's at the trial or in the charge to the jury that calls for retrial of the cause. The questions raised in the motion for a new trial all relate to matters that were fully…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The learned court below could not have directed a verdict for the plaintiff, as requested by his first and second points. The question of fact for the jury, under the evidence, was as to the amount he was entitled to recover on his mortgage, and, as that has been established by the verdict, the judgment on it is affirmed.
2Cited by7 opinions
- Harper v. Consolidated Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Foulke v. Hatfield Fair Grounds Bazaar, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- In Re West Chestnut Realty of Haverford, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Philadelphia Acceptance Corp. v. Krapf, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1984
- First Federal S. & L. Ass'n v. Street Road Shopping Center, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.