Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Tatem

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 28, 1966PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.

Appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualifying claimant from benefits on the grounds that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause by provoking his discharge (Labor Law, § 593, subd. 1). The record reveals that on May 29, 1964 claimant, a product coder whose regular hours were 9 :00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., despite the receipt just two days previously of an official memorandum that further unauthorized absences from the premises would not be permitted, was admitted to employer’s premises by the employer himself shortly before 9 :00 a.m.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Claim of MalaspinaNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. In re the Claim of MalaspinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Claim of YukselAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API