Forrest v. Baker
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
Appellants, Claudie Maples Forrest and Eugene Alexander, have consolidated their election contest cases for appeal. Each was a candidate for a separate position as alderman of the City of Earle in the 1984 general election. The trial court ruled that both candidates failed to state facts upon which relief could be granted. See ARCP Rule 12(b)(6). We affirm.
Appellant Forrest alleged that the county election commission certified that appellee Walter Baker received 590 votes for alderman of ward two, position two, and that appellant Forrest received 564, a difference of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hill v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Moore v. ChildersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Simonetti v. BrickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Wilson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Lehigh v. WooleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
3Cited by3 opinions
- Roe v. Mobile County Appointment Bd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Chadwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
- Binns v. HeckSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995