Moore v. Childers
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Kirby, J.,
(after stating the facts). The court did not err in refusing to make the nunc pro tunc, order requested. Upon a hearing it was disclosed that appellant’s attorneys, when the demurrer was sustained, did not ask leave to amend, and the court noted on its docket that appellant elected to stand on his complaint and declined to amend, and dismissed it. The deputy clerk stated that the court read the docket entry, and none of appellant’s attorneys objected to it, and that the motion to amend was not filed until the next day, September 1, which was more than 10 days after the expiration of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Storey v. LooneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Hill v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Bland v. BentonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Gower v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
3Cited by14 opinions
- McClendon v. McKeownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
- Jones v. EtheridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Willis v. KingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- McCastlain v. ElmoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Wilson v. EllisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.