Richland S. S. Co. v. Buffalo Dry Dock Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of New York. Libel by the Buffalo Dry Dock Company against the steamship Rich-land Queen, her engines, etc., claimed by the Richland Steamship Company, together with a libel by the RichlanduSteamship Company against the Buffalo Dry Dock Company. From decrees for the Dry Dock Company,- the Steamship Company appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
WARD, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a decree of Judge Hazel in favor of the Buffalo Dry Dock Company for the reasonable cost of repairs to the steamer Richland Queen, and dismissing the cross-libel of the Richland Steamship Company for, damages for loss of the use of the vessel due to unreasonable delay in making the repairs.
September 5, 1916, the steamer was sent to the Dry Dock Company’s yard, and remained there until December 5th. No express contract for the repairs was made, but the reasonable value of the use of the dry dock and of the repairs is admitted to have been $39,984.08.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Empire Transp. Co. v. Philadelphia & R. Coal & Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Geismer v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Blackstock v. . the New York and Erie Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Del., L. W.R.R. Co. v. . BownsNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. SchaffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Ritchie v. Oregon Short Line R. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1926
- The No. C-4District Court, S.D. New York · 1923
- Warren v. Portland Terminal Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1922
- Curtis Elev. Co., Inc. v. Hampshire HouseNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.