Legal Opinion

Steere Tank Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 25, 1982No. 81-4169PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Steere challenges the Interstate Commerce Commission’s grant of an application by the Maxwell Company to remove a restriction on Maxwell’s authorization to transport goods. Under Maxwell’s previous authorization, it could transport “spent silica gel catalyst, in bulk.” The new authorization empowers Maxwell to transport “commodities in bulk,” without further restriction. The genesis of the ICC’s decision is its “Guidelines” for removal of restrictions on commodities that a carrier may transport. 49 C.F.R. § 1137.21(b). In Steere’s view, these guidelines contravene the ICC’s authority under…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. C & H Transportation Co., Inc. And J.H. Rose Truck Line, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  2. Port Norris Express Co., Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Dennis Trucking Company, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  3. Ritter Transportation, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Port Norris Express Co., Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
  4. Global Van Lines, Inc., Wheaton Van Lines, Inc., and Freight Forwarders Institute v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. Coastal Tank Lines, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API