Legal Opinion
Oberne v. Burke
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided March 3, 1897No. 7134PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Error, from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Hopewell, J.
1Opinion of the CourtPost, C. J.
This is a proceeding prosecuted by the plaintiffs in error, hereafter called the defendants, to reverse a judgment of the district court for Douglas county based upon the following instrument:
*765“South Omaha, Neb., April 26,1897.
“M. Burke <& Sons, U. S. Yards, Neb. — Dear Sirs: We will guaranty the payment by R. Kunath in thirty days the sum of seven hundred ninety-one and 28-100 dollars, for seventeen head of cattle.. “Oberne, Hosick &. Co.,
“Per Harmon.”
By the answer interposed below every allegation of the petition is put in issue; however, the only substantial controversy relates to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Johnston v. Milwaukee & Wyoming Investment Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Lantry v. WolffNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Oberne v. BurkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by4 opinions
- Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co. v. GilliamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Furrer v. Nebraska Building & Investment Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1923
- Shimonek v. Nebraska Building & Investment Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Citizens State Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1936