Legal Opinion

Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co. v. Gilliam

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided January 23, 1931PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Dietzman.

Affirming.

This appeal is an aftermath of the litigation involved in the case of Gilliam v. Spillman Motor Co., 220 Ky. 264, 294 S. W. 1090. As appears from that case, Gilliam, on the 10th day of June, 1926, purchased a one-third interest in the Spillman Motor Company, a copartnership, paying therefor $5,500 in cash. He thereafter advanced the company $3,308 on July 1st following. Having become dissatisfied with his purchase, he sued for a cancellation and rescission of the contract and a recovery of the money loaned. In the alternative, he sought a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Walworth County Bank v. Farmers Loan & Trust Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. StockwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Allin v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Dana v. TurlaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  5. Oberne v. BurkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Saint Joseph Healthcare, Inc. v. ThomasKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Crump v. SabathCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  3. Anglo-American Mill Co. v. Kentucky Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. Catlettsburg & Buchannan Telephone Co. v. BondCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  5. Bennett v. County Bd. of Ed. of Harlan Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API