Legal Opinion
People v. Reese
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 11, 2006PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defen*583dant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ferdinand, J.), imposed December 8, 2004, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon his plea of guilty.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s claim that the sentence imposed constituted cruel and unusual punishment is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Rosario, 22 AD3d 871, 872 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 780 [2006]; People v Gomez, 277 AD2d 250, 251…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. AlbanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. BuffaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. RobinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. BoltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. GomezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. ParsleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. ClergeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.