Roccaforte v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
KRUEGER, Judge.
The offense is seduction. The punishment assessed is confinement in the State penitentiary for a term of five years.
Appellant first challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to justify and sustain his conviction. After a most careful review of the State’s testimony, we are of the opinion that his contention is well founded.
The material testimony adduced by the State, briefly stated, is as follows: The father of the prosecutrix testified that on one occasion the appellant, together with another boy, a girl and the prosecutrix, came to his home for the purpose of permitting her…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
- State v. ReevesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Gleason v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ramirez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1945