Legal Opinion

Hofheimer v. . Campbell

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 15, 1874PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The facts stated in the complaint were all specifically admitted by the answer which also set up a release of the cause of action. The judge decided that the alleged defence was not valid, and directed a verdict for the plaintiff upon the facts thus admitted contained in the complaint, to which there was an exception. It is insisted that the attention of the court was not called to any defect in the complaint and that no such question can be urged here. The…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brady v. . NallyNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Halstead v. . MullenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  3. Caddo Nat. Bank v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Potomac Electric Power Co. v. HemlerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1917
  5. United States Land & Investment Co. v. BusseyNew York Supreme Court · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API