Legal Opinion

Bridenstine v. Gerlinger Motor Car Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1917PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From Clackamas: James U. Campbell, Judge. In Banc. Statement by Mr. Justice Harris. The defendants, Gerlinger Motor Car Company, a corporation, E. E. Gerlinger, and F. P. Coulter appealed from a judgment obtained against them by the plaintiffs David N. Bridenstine and Phebe S. Bridenstine, Ms wife, in an action for damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of fraudulent representations inducing an exchange of properties.

Read the full summary

From Clackamas: James U. Campbell, Judge. In Banc. Statement by Mr. Justice Harris. The defendants, Gerlinger Motor Car Company, a corporation, E. E. Gerlinger, and F. P. Coulter appealed from a judgment obtained against them by the plaintiffs David N. Bridenstine and Phebe S. Bridenstine, Ms wife, in an action for damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of fraudulent representations inducing an exchange of properties. David N. Bridenstine owned a hundred acre farm in Clackamas County. The Gerlinger Motor Car Company owned two houses and lots in Multnomah County, one of which for…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harris

The twenty-three assignments of error may be arranged in three groups. Some of the assignments of *416error depend upon the contention of the defendants that incompetent evidence was received in support of the allegation that C. C. Hargroves was acting as an agent of the Gerlinger Motor Car Company and that there was not enough evidence to authorize the court to submit the question of the agency of Hargroves to the jury; other assignments of error arise out of the claim that there was not sufficient evidence to support' the charge of fraud; and the remaining assignments of error relate to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whiting v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  2. Briggs v. BrushaberMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Wicktorwitz v. Farmers' InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Whiting v. PriceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  5. Bradford v. NeillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Briggs v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Press v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. First National BankDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1955
  4. Syfert v. SolomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company v. JamiesonOregon Supreme Court · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API