Faul v. Beucus
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Barry; Smith, J. Attachment proceedings in justice’s court by George Eaul against Thomas Beucus and others, in which proceeding Frank F. Hilbert and others were garnishees. There was a judgment, for plaintiff, and the principal defendants removed the cause to the circuit court by certiorari. From a judgment there for plaintiff, defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
The above cause was commenced in justice’s court by suing out a writ of attachment on March 7,1899, against the principal defendants. On March lGth following, three affidavits in garnishment were filed with the justice by the plaintiff, and a writ of garnishment was issued in each case against the garnishee defendant. The writs of garnishment were in the usual form. The return to each of these writs recites that the writ was served on the garnishee defendant therein named by reading the same to him, and leaving him a copy, and paying him his fees of 50 cents. The attachment by which the…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Wilmer v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
- Edward Thompson Co. v. MaynardMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Knack v. BerlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1907