Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. McClendon

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1997No. 63066-6Published

1ConcurrenceTalmadge, J.

(concurring) — While I agree with the majority opinion, I do not believe we need to rely on the rather unpredictable course of the United States Supreme *870Court’s double jeopardy jurisprudence to reach the conclusion in the majority opinion.55 The present case rises and falls on a single question: is the license action punishment? If it is punishment, jeopardy attaches.

Jurisdictions that have considered the question have overwhelmingly held licensure actions to be remedial, not punishment: Thompson v. State, 896 F. Supp. 220 (D. Me. 1995) (suspension of license under Maine statute was not…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. State v. GockenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. HigaHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API