Legal Opinion

Jung Wook Na v. Jasmine Na

District Court, C.D. California

Decided September 4, 2026No. 8:25-cv-02479Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 JUNG WOOK NA, Case No. 8:25-CV-02479-DOC-ADS 14 Petitioner, 15 16 vs. ORDER AND JUDGMENT 17 GRANTING PETITION IN PART1; 18 JASMINE NA, FINDINGS OF FACT & 19 Respondent. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 This case arises under the Hague Convention’s International Child Abduction 2 Remedies Act (“ICARA”),

22 U.S.C. §§9001

et seq. The parties are the parents of K.E.N and 3 S.A.N. They disagree regarding which country—the United States or South Korea—is the home 4 of their shared children. The…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Robert v. TessonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Emanuel Friedrich v. Jeana Michele Friedrich, David Harper and Shirley HarperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. Monasky v. TaglieriSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  4. Williams v. PoulosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Anthony FioreCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API