Legal Opinion
Padilla v. U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided April 5, 2019No. CASE NO. C18-928 MJPPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Marsha J. Pechman, United States District Judge
The above-entitled Court, having received and reviewed:
1. Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. No. 45),
2. Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. No. 82),
3. Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. No. 85),
all attached declarations and exhibits, and relevant portions of the record, and having heard oral argument thereon, rules as follows:
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. With regard to the Bond Hearing Class, Defendant Executive Office for Immigration…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Banda v. McAleenanDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- Yolany Padilla v. IceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Castellar v. McAleenanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019
- Betschart v. GarrettDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
- Betschart v. GarrettDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.