Legal Opinion

Harrisburg Dairies, Inc. v. Eisaman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 1937No. Appeal, 11PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

This is a bill in equity to restrain the members of the Milk Control Commission from enforcing the provisions of Article V of the Act of April 28,1937, P. L. 417. This article, section 501, provides that dealers purchasing milk from producers must file with the Cpmmission a bond, conditioned for the payment by the dealer for all milk purchased. The other sections of this article contain provisions relative to these bonds. The court below granted a preliminary injunction and subsequently continued the same until final hearing. From this action this appeal is taken.

As recognized by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KatzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Hoffman v. Johnstown & Somerset Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Stim v. BezinecSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Railroad v. DriscollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Harrisburg Dairies, Inc. v. EisamanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Yale Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Knitgoods Workers Union Local 190Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Salus v. Lawrence, SEC. of Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Salus v. Lawrence, SEC. of Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API