Legal Opinion

Vigil v. Pacheco

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 1, 1934No. 13,586PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

These parties appeared in reverse order in the trial court and are hereinafter designated as there.

This was a suit to cancel a promissory note. Defendant counterclaimed and sued out a writ of attachment. A general demurrer to the cross-complaint was filed and ruling thereon reserved. On a trial to the court plaintiff had judgment. To review that judgment defendant prosecutes this writ and asks that it be made a supersedeas. The assignments go to every finding of the court as contrary to the law and not supported by the evidence, and further present the question of the court’s failure to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gwynn v. ButlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  2. Carper v. Frost Oil Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  3. Roberts v. DietzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mountain States Oil Corp. v. SandovalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  2. Baumgartner v. TweedySupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  3. Worthen Bank & Trust Co., National Ass'n v. Silvercool Service Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API