Legal Opinion

Baumgartner v. Tweedy

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 8, 1960No. 18761PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff in error Baumgartner was one of several defendants in the trial court and will be referred to as Baumgartner or defendant.

The action was brought by the law firm of Tweedy and Fowler of Denver seeking to collect for legal services alleged to be due and owing to them from the Minerals Exploration Research Company, a partnership. All of the partners, including Baumgartner, were made defendants and served with process, as was the Minerals Exploration Research Corporation, a corporation, as successor to the partnership. All of the defendants, except Baumgartner, defaulted. Baumgartner…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Denver National Bank v. McLaganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1956
  2. Thomas v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  3. Vigil v. PachecoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  4. Sutton v. AhartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Page v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  2. M.D.C./Wood, Inc. v. MortimerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  3. City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. Craig v. RiderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  5. In Re Estate of GranberryColorado Court of Appeals · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API