Legal Opinion
Eshawn Maurice Harrell v. Dunleavy, et al.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 27, 2026No. 5:25-cv-07437Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ESHAWN MAURICE HARRELL, Case No. 25-cv-07437-NW 8 Plaintiff, ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT, 9 v. DISMISSING WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 10 DUNLEAVY, et al., Defendants. 11 12 13 Plaintiff Eshawn Maurice Harrell, a state detainee, filed a pro se civil rights complaint 14 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1. The Complaint is now before the Court for screening 15 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). For the reasons outlined below, the Court DISMISSES the 16 Complaint with leave to amend. 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 Harrell alleges that private…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.