Karl Kiefer Mach. Co. v. Unionwerke, A. G.
District Court, S.D. New York
In Equity. Suit by the Karl Kiefer Machine Company and Karl Kiefer against Unionwerke, A. G., and against Nathan H. Heyman.
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, District Judge.
Infringement suits on three patents for a filter for straining beer and ale, including also claims for the filter cake itself, and on one reissue patent on a press for packing the filter cake. There is also included in the Heymán case a cause of action for the repeal of a later patent issued to defendant Heyman as assignee of Benuo Danziger. The patents involved are:
Reissue patent No. 12,455, to Karl Kiefer, dated February 20, 1906 (original applied for June 12, 1905, No. 797,122).
Patent No. 993,780, to Karl Kiefer, applied for April 16, 1906, issued May 30, 1911.
Patent…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- The Incandescent Lamp PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Herman v. Youngstown Car Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Metropolitan Electric Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- General Electric Co. v. George J. Hagan Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1929
- In re KaislingCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930