Legal Opinion

Burdick v. Tucker

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 25, 1989No. 87CA0857PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLANK, Judge.

Thomas R. and Susan K. Tucker (defendants) appeal the judgment of the trial court finding them liable on a promissory note in the sum of $31,408.08. The defendants and Robert J. Safranek, the defendants’ attorney, also appeal the portion of the judgment entered against them in the amount of $10,362.50 for advocating non-meritorious defenses and counterclaims. We reverse and remand.

Robert C. and Debra L. Burdick (plaintiffs) commenced this action on defendants’ secured promissory note in the principal sum of $20,000. This promissory note was executed in connection with defendants’…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Community Manage. Ass'n of Colorado Sp. v. TousleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. FMA Financial Corp. v. Pro-PrintersUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Simmons MacH. Co. Inc. v. M. & M Brokerage, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. First National Bank of Denver v. CillessenColorado Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. FarrarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Greathouse v. Charter National Bank-SouthwestTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. May v. Women's Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. All Valley Acceptance Co. v. DurfeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Earl of Loveless, Inc. v. GabeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Greathouse v. Charter National Bank-SouthwestTexas Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API