Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Inboden

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 25, 2010No. 1 CA-CV 08-0180PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROWN, Judge.

¶ 1 Lowell Inboden (“Husband”) appeals from the family court’s decree of dissolution. He argues that the court erred in ordering an unequal distribution of the marital home in favor of Carolyn Inboden (“Wife”). For the following reasons, we vacate the court’s decree in part and remand for further proceedings.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Husband and Wife married in July 2005. Shortly before the marriage, Wife used $90,000 of her separate funds to buy an undeveloped lot in Yuma and the couple took title to the lot as joint tenants. After they married, the parties built a house on the lot…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hatch v. HatchArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Toth v. TothArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re Marriage of FlowerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. Lonergan v. StromCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. Valladee v. ValladeeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Andaloro v. AndaloroCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
  2. Beasley-Rodriguez v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Carter v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  4. Dekker v. DekkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  5. Horst v. HorstCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API